AUSTRALIA DAY

I SUSPECT THAT MANY OF YOU, LIKE MYSELF, ARE GETTING THOROUGHLY SICK AND TIRED OF THE MISSINFORMATION BEING PUT AROUND ON THE INTERNET ABOUT JANUARY 26TH, AUSTRALIA DAY.

Here is how it actually came about.

CAPTAIN COOK AND THE FIRST FLEET

Captain Cook landed at Kurnell, Botany Bay on the 28th of April, 1770, and claimed the east coast of the Australian continent for Britain, naming it New South Wales.

The first boat of the First Fleet landed at Botany Bay on 18 January, 1788, but the Fleet then later moved to Port Jackson (what became Sydney).

Yes – Arthur Phillip arrived at Sydney Cove on 25th January 1788 and the next day a flag was raised as was the Royal Naval practice. It wasn’t until some 30 years later that the Union Jack was raised to under the direction by Governor Darling to commemorate that settlement at Sydney Cove.

THE NAMING OF AUSTRALIA

January 1st 1900 was not the day that Australia was named. It was the day that the Commonwealth of Australia was formed by the federation of six British colonies: New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, and Tasmania1

The name Australia was derived from the Latin word australis, meaning “southern”, and was used to refer to the hypothetical landmass in the south pole, known as Terra Australis.

The name Australia was first suggested by the English explorer Matthew Flinders in 1804, who circumnavigated the continent and drew a map of it. He preferred the name Australia over New Holland, which was the name given by the Dutch in the 17th century.

The name Australia was officially adopted by the British Admiralty in 1824, and was used in British legislation in 1828. The name Commonwealth of Australia was formalised in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, which was passed by the UK Parliament.

January 1st, 1901 was the day that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 came into effect.

Aboriginals never had a name for their country. There were several hundred separate tribes, most of which had their own language. The only names were the Aboriginal names for their various regions, roughly defined as their “hunting grounds” which were vigorously defended from invasion by any of the neighbouring tribes.

JANUARY 26th

The real relevance of January 26th is when the National and Citizenship Act 1948 was proclaimed. This was the first day we all became Australians. Prior to that, all citizens, including Aboriginals born after 1921 were called “British Subjects.”

Prior to this time, the various British colonies in Australia all had their own “Australia Day”, which was celebrated on a range of dates

The excuses for calling Australia Day (26th January) “Invasion Day”, based on the supposition that the date was either Captain Cook’s first landing, or the arrival of the First Fleet, are simply WRONG!

It was Arthur Phillip who was committed to establishing and maintaining friendly and peaceful relationships with the Aboriginal people and his friendship and support by Woollarawarre Bennelong, a Wangal man who grew up on the Parramatta River.
Phillips official orders are recorded as “concilliate their (aboriginals) affections and live in amity and kindness with them” and this shows Phillip as both progressive as well as having loyalty to the British Empire.
Bennelong in many ways acted as an intermediary between the aboriginal people and the Colonial settlers.

Note here that the International Court in the Hague ruled that any territory subject to invasion prior to 1935 is not recognised as requiring restitution or compensation.
Also worthy of note is that in the culture of all Indigenous Aboriginal Peoples, it is acknowledged that it is the Land which owns them, they are instead the stewards/ custodians, rather than owners of the land

CONCLUSION

“The 26th of January is a great day for all of us. It is the day that Australians received their citizenship. The day which celebrates the implementation of the Nationality and Citizenship act of 1948, when we all became Australians in our own right. An Act giving freedom and protection to all Australians, old and new, the right to live under the protection of Australian Law, as a united nation.

Now, this annual date for a national celebration each year on January 26th is important. So, let’s just celebrate the day for what it is, the fact that we are Australians in our own right.”

And not talk of changing it for all the wrong reasons.

It is important that all Australian Citizens know these things and that it is a mandated inclusion within the curriculum of our education systems.

(Researched by Ray Read & Ian Childs 15/01/2024.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Enjoying this Life we’ve been given!

As we hustle and bustle through our daily lives, finding those moments of genuine happiness and enjoyment sometimes feels like a distant dream. Yet, your Bible provides a timeless source of wisdom and guidance. It offers profound insights into the enjoyment of your life.

Let’s examine a few Bible verses about enjoying life, about savouring every moment, and learn from the teachings of our Saviour about finding joy in our very existence. From the joyful affirmations in Psalms to the wise counsels of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, we can explore the spiritual roadmap for our life filled with happiness as well as contentment.

A Partial List of Bible Verses About Enjoying Life

The Bible is replete with verses that reflect God’s desire for His followers to enjoy the life He has given. Ecclesiastes 5:19, for instance, reminds us that it is a gift from God to enjoy the good in our labour. This enjoyment is not merely about indulging in earthly pleasures but finding joy in the blessings, stewardship and tasks God entrusts to us. It’s a Divine invitation to appreciate the beauty of what God created the love of the family (both our parents and offspring who really need to be viewed as God owned in our care), and the satisfaction of doing things correctly and to the best of our potential, rather than shoddily.

We need to be mindful that the Gifts be it talents or what our family and life connections provide are all given by our God & Creator, and we should focus upon what we can achieve to Glorify Him.

A happy life, according to Biblical teachings, is rooted in more than just the external circumstances of wealth, health, or social status. Among Bible verses about enjoying life Philippians 4:11-13 teaches about finding contentment in every situation through Christ who strengthens us. It underscores the importance of a grateful heart and a steadfast trust in God’s plan, as key components of true happiness.

The Bible encourages us to live fully in each moment. Matthew 6:34 advises against worrying about tomorrow, highlighting the importance of focusing on the present and trusting God with the future. This teaching urges believers to appreciate the beauty and blessings of the current moment, without being burdened and where to place our worries and fears (Matthew 11:28) including our past regrets or future anxieties.

Abundant Life

While many people look for Bible verses about enjoying life Jesus Christ’s teachings often centred on the theme of abundant life. In John 10:10, Jesus declares, “I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” This statement highlights Jesus’ desire for those who followers his teachings, to experience a life marked by joy, peace, and fulfilment, found through faith and obedience to His teachings. Given that Christ’s apostles all were persecuted till their lives were taken, appears to contradict this. However, when we read of the apostles accounts in Acts and the letters to the Churches, we find that they were all quite content as they spread the Gospel Message of Redemption.

God’s Permission for Enjoyment

Scripture clearly indicates that God not only allows but encourages us to enjoy the life we were given and enjoy it to the full measure. 1 Timothy 6:17 instructs the wealthy not to place their hope by being anxious about their wealth but to enjoy all the bounteous good things God provides. This principle applies universally, encouraging all to gratefully receive and enjoy God’s blessings.

Psalm 16:11 declares, “You make known to me the path of life; in Your presence there is fullness of joy; at Your right hand are pleasures forevermore.” This Psalm beautifully encapsulates the idea that true joy and happiness are found in the presence of God, guiding believers towards spiritual fulfilment and eternal pleasures.

Proverbs 15:13 states, “A happy heart makes the face cheerful, but heartache crushes the spirit.” Similarly, Proverbs 17:22 teaches, “A cheerful heart is good medicine, but a crushed spirit dries up the bones.” These verses highlight the intrinsic link between a joyful heart, physical well-being, and the power of a positive outlook on life’s challenges.

Ecclesiastes 3:13 says, “That everyone may eat and drink, and find satisfaction in all his toil—this is the gift of God.” This verse reminds us of the importance of finding joy in our daily endeavours and recognising these moments as divine gifts, emphasising the balance between work and enjoyment as essential for a fulfilling life.

This exploration of Bible verses about enjoying life reveals a profound truth: happiness and joy are not only encouraged by God but are central to the Christian faith. The scriptures guide us toward a life of contentment, rooted in faith, gratitude, and the simple pleasures bestowed by our Creator. Whether through the profound teachings of Jesus, the joyful proclamations of Psalms, or the wise counsel of Proverbs, the Bible offers us a path to a life that is not just endured but richly enjoyed.

Juan Carlos Autez summed it up nicely when he demanded of believers to use the material possessions that they have in stewardship, to further the Gospel.

  1. If you have a car and time, how about transporting those in need?
  2. If you have a weekender, boat, caravan – how are you giving this back to God?

What it doesn’t mean

The Bible does not say we shall not have trials or even persecution in or lives or even that life would be easy.

The Bible does not indicate that being lazy and self-absorbed will be rewarded in either this life or the Eternal, quite the contrary and any idea of Heaven being a place where we spend an Eternity laying on a couch whist being fed grapes and delicacies by the heavenly host is simply wrong.

Our God is a working God and we were made in his image, so get ready for tasks which will take us through Eternity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

LiPo Batteries Marine Risk

An increase in the amount of lithium-ion battery yacht fires has prompted The UK’s Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) to release new fire safety and storage guidelines of small electric powered craft on yachts.

Engineers Australia’s Society of Fire Safety is currently developing guidelines for mitigation and controls for Battery Electric Vehicle fires and one of the prime issues is that rupture of the battery containment expels some very toxic materials and it is imperative that this remain separated from human contact.

One of the big issues is that water may react with some of the exposed materials in this chemical fire and become a reactive fire where the water can increase the fires intensity, becoming a reactive fire.

Industry groups have estimated 16 total losses due to fire between August 2021 and August 2022, with the source of around half of these fires yet to be known. One potential source for the fires, among many others, could be lithium-ion battery fires. There has been an increase in ownership of electric tenders, jet skis, eFoils, and other watercraft, which are powered by lithium-ion batteries rather than fueled by petrol. The MCA’s new guidelines have taken into consideration that the fire prevention, detection, and suppression measures of the petrol generation are not always viable for lithium battery powered crafts.

The new guidelines for storage and charging detail that craft should be stored in spaces that, as a minimum, comply with requirements of Part A of the REG yacht code. Keeping track of humidity limitations, temperature ranges, and maintenance requirements while storing crafts and batteries is pertinent as well. Any damaged craft or batteries should be handled with extreme caution, and damaged batteries should not be charged again.

See the UK guidelines here

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mgn-681-m-fire-safety-and-storage-of-small-electric-powered-craft-on-yachts/mgn-681-m-fire-safety-and-storage-of-small-electric-powered-craft-on-yachts

New technologies help detect issues with batteries before a fire starts.

Fires aboard large yachts are not new, but what is changing is the types of fires and struggles to put them out. The latest year for which reliable data exists is 2018. During that year there were 39 fires on board large yachts, with 32 of those on board vessels under 500 gross tons; of the 39 fires, 37 were on motor yachts. There is a growing concern within the industry with the number of lithium-ion battery devices on board and the fire danger those devices present.

The International Superyacht Society’s Leadership Series explored many issues affecting the industry. The “hot” topic that everyone was interested to hear about was fire safety — specifically, the concern over lithium-ion battery fires. The number of lithium-ion batteries in the world is increasing exponentially. Obviously, everyone carries a cellphone, at the bare minimum. However, yachts are particularly affected due to the increased number of toys and other devices on board that use lithium-ion batteries. There is also a big push within the industry to go green, which means increases in the size of batteries on board to run hotel and propulsion systems.

What makes these fires so dangerous is the nature in which they combust. The process in which they burn is called thermal runaway – an entire thesis could be written on the subject. As it stands, there are no regulations covering detection or suppression of such fires. In fact, industry experts disagree on the correct ways to handle these incidents. Further, most crews and first responders lack the proper training on how to handle these types of fires.

“Fire, in itself, is a scary topic to insurers. There is no such thing as a good fire,” said Laura Sherrod of Newcoast Insurance. “Our biggest concern is the aging of our yachts and how we prevent losses from chafe, electrical, and lack of maintenance issues.”

However, it’s not all doom, gloom, and boom. There are currently available technologies that can significantly improve the detection of potential issues with batteries and warn crew up to 20 minutes ahead of thermal runaway. This early detection is a substantial advantage in mitigating risk to the vessel. Aspirating smoke detectors actively monitor the air and use lasers to analyze the particulate matter, which can reduce detection time up to five times sooner than traditional ones.

This will continue to be a “hot” button issue within the industry. The regulators, insurers, and manufacturers are working towards solutions. Industry experts are also working to provide the necessary education and training for crew. This issue won’t be extinguished anytime soon.

My own take on this is that battery manufacturers need to manufacture cells which have a thermal sensor integrated into the battery cell anode (each and every cell) which isolates upon reaching a nominated temperature (say 50°C) the battery, and this should obstruct thermal runaway.

Engineers Australia’s Society of Fire Safety is currently developing guidelines for mitigation and controls for Battery Electric Vehicle fires and one of the prime issues is that rupture of the battery containment expels some very toxic materials and it is imperative that this remain separated from human contact. I would suggest that this is an even greater issue for such a fire on a vessel.

Remember that an ICE (petrol/diesel) fuel fire burns at approx.. 435°C whereas a Lithium-Ion battery fire burns at 2,760°C that’s over 6 times the heat of the petrol fire and then there is the toxic vapour cloud to consider.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Parlour Edition 5

BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING GUIDE TO INTEGRATED DESIGN

This is essential course material for anyone involved in Architecture, Design of Building Services, Project Construction Management, Certification of Buildings and Building Elements, and those who teach this.

It covers Integrated design: airconditioning, vertical transport, electric power and lighting, fire protection plus water supply and hydraulics.

It answers: why are these services required, what equipment needs to be installed, how much plantroom space needs to be allocated for the equipment as well as how much it weighs>
What are the implications of the total building’s design, and
provides working examples.

This latest Edition (5) provides:
Up to date guidance for non-engineering specialists to participate in the building services early design process.
Integrated design is expanded to guide the reader through the essential stages of client consultation, feasibility and selection of the design criteria, regulation compliance, the principal early ‘big picture’ issues.

  • Subsequent chapters provide updated overview of systems and equipment required for air conditioning, building transport systems, electrical power & lighting, fire protection as well as hydraulics/water supply, with considerations for inclusion of Battery Electric Vehicle charging and inclusion of lighting.Supplement for current building regulations current at time of publication (with link for updating)

My biased opinion is that it is the best guide of its type out there and a tribute to both Richard Parlour who put together Edition 1 in 1994 and reinforced it with a further 2 editions to 2000, and then Alan Obrart who greatly enhanced and broadened it with Edition 4 in 2016. All we have done is modernise and add lighting plus enhance the fire protection side.
Anyway check it out for yourselves..

At present it is only available as a view only e-copy (pdf) and under a special deal until after ARBS2024 at Sydney ICC May 28th to 30th is available to existing financial members and new members of the Society of Building Services Engineers (a technical society of Engineers Australia) for the price of $20 incl.GST.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SBSE

Formation of the Society for Building Services Engineers:

This journey has been some twenty years in the making and there are a number of people and events to recall as an integral part of the journey and the author apologises for not including everyone and everything:-

  1. Adj. Professor David Hood AM, Hon FIEAust, as Director Engineering for The Institution of Engineers Australia, saw both the importance and potential of having an engineering discipline called “building services engineering” in the mid. 1980’s and commenced a national body within Engineers Australia titled the Building Services Engineering Council (BSEC) to monitor this new and emerging discipline, which operated until the mid. 1990’s. Two of the members of the BSEC were Alan Obrart (NSW) and Kevan McGill (WA).
  2. In 1998, following the closure of the BSEC, EA authorized the establishment of a National Council for the SBSE and two of the representatives and also Vice Presidents of the inaugural Council were Alan Obrart (NSW) and Terry Spiro (WA).
  3. Initially SBSE’s home within EA was with the Mechanical College, then jointly with both the Mechanical and Electrical Colleges and finally/currently with the Electrical College.
  4. For a range of reasons the SBSE National Council went into recess between 2003 and 2008 and appeared to be around in name only. Except that Alan Obrart continued operating an SBSE Chapter in NSW and Kevan and Terry kept an SBSE Panel running in WA. There were also joint kindred groups operating in VIC, SA and QLD.
  5. Following an operational declaration, by the EA Director of Engineering in 2008, former EA Associate Director of Registration, Michael Bevan was appointed to establish ‘NPER – Building Services’ through the National Engineering Registration Board (NERB) and this proved to be a significant event. It would be remiss not to mention the work and support of National Manager Sheryl Harrington with her limited staffing resources and what they have achieved for The Society.
  6. In 2009 SBSE National Committee was reformed and Alan Obrart elected as National Chair and Terry Spiro as Deputy. Reforming SBSE turned out to be much harder than starting from scratch and there were times when Alan and Terry wondered what we had taken on but remained grateful for the high level support from David Hood, Dr Marlene Kanga and Alex Baitch who were all National Presidents of EA and greatly assisted this Society’s journey.
  7. Between 2012 and 2014 we were very busy with the re launch of SBSE at the EA Convention 2014 in Melbourne. To support SBSE the Electrical College elected to call their one-day seminar, which they fully funded, a “Building Services Symposium”.  

Current National Committee

Alan Coote                          National Chair & TAS Rep.             Specialist BSE Electrical

Alan Obrart                         Deputy National Chair                   NER-Mechanical and Building Services

Terry Spiro                          National Treasurer                         NER-Mechanical and Building Services

 Caretaker    WA Representative.      

Prof. David Hood, AM      QLD Representative                       Engineering Sustainability

Ian Childs                           NSW Representative                     Specialist BSE and Fire Compliance

Brett Fairweather              National & Liaison Rep.                 BSE Mech. Standards & Training

Roger Blackwell                 National Representative                NER-Mechanical and Building Services

Peter Murton                    SA Representative                          Building Services Design (Electrical)

Caretaker              VIC Representative                         

Re Launch of SBSE

The re launch in 2014 was a significant event and achieved the following:-

  • The total and unconditional support of EA directly from the CEO and National President.
  • Australia wide advertising for SBSE.
  • An article in the EA Journal ahead of the re launch.
  • Joint recognition on the platform for the release of EA “Sustainability” and “Climate Change Policies” driven by Adj Professor David Hood AM
  • A brand SBSE brochure prepared by Alan Obrart and the NSW committee.
  • Rewrite of the “Rules for Chapters” by Terry Spiro and WA committee.
  • Re instatement of the SBSE on the EA website, and is an ongoing project
  • Electrical College Board inclusion of SBSE, to have their own awards segment, in the prestigious ECB Annual Dinner and Awards Night, which is now a permanent arrangement.

BSE Certification

Over the last few years SBSE has moved quickly to be recognized as the only organization in Australia to have BSE Certification and achieve the following:-

  • Successful National Conference, Annual Meeting and National Committee Meeting in Brisbane 2016.
  • Having representatives in QLD, NSW, VIC, TAS, SA and WA.
  • Conducting the SBSE roadshow or similar in WA, VIC, QLD and NT.
  • Successful transfer of NPER – Building Services to NER – Building Services.
  • The important work of Adj Professor David Hood AM continues in reporting the impact of climate change.
  • Setting up the framework to create supplementary registers in Building Services for EA Associate and Technologist grades.
  • In 2016 the new SBSE web address www.sbse.org.au was established, which directly feeds into the EA sbse website https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/Communities-And-Groups/Technical-Societies/Society-For-Building-Services-Engineers in the EA new societies web format and establishing the SBSE mailserver by Ian Childs, and this uses EA new Societies web format.
  • Establishing an SBSE National member’s register, by Chapter, thanks to Graham, with a total of around 700, accepting there may be duplication between SBSE and NER lists.
  • Finalizing of the SBSE Banners, Thanks to input from Alan Obrart, Graham and Sheryl.
  • EC Confirmation of ARBS as SBSE industry and members forum

SBSE Representation

 SBSE continues to grow and now has representation on a number of EA and Standards committees including:

  1. AS/NZS1668.1&2 Brett Fairweather,
  2. AS1682.1&2 ian Childs,
  3. AS1851 Ian Childs & Brett Fairweather,
  4. AS/NZS3666.1,2,3&4 Ian Childs

National Responsibilities Within EA

As a Society within Engineers Australia SBSE has responsibility to provide opportunities for its members to meet at least biennially and in that regard has elected to do that at ARBS so that our members can meet with kindred industry groups and encourage the widest possible cooperation, which is important for the growth of our industry which was founded from Air Conditioning to HVAC to Mechanical Services plus facilities management and now to Building Services Engineering whilst maintaining that focus on science and engineering being the key to the success and perhaps the survival of the industry into the future.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BEV Hazards

With the push to take up having Electric Vehicles we have some significant concerns pertaining to the fire risk and especially when charging the Lithium-Ion batteries associated with these vehicles.

We are also concerned that the Fire Brigade first responders are neither appropriately equipped nor appropriately trained in their response to these vehicle fires.

Our preference would be to ensure that the battery is contained and that a fire smothering agent is incorporated at manufacture and off-gassing monitoring which immediately triggers charging shut-off and local alert. As this is currently not the case, we offer the following additional insights:

A Lithium-Ion vehicle battery fire escalates when there is a rupture of the battery casing with subsequent release of very toxic and volatile gasses and chemical product.
Should the chemical products come into contact with water, then a reactive fire shall result which will significantly increase the intensity of the fire and elevate and further release of chemicals and the products of combustion until the fuel source is consumed.

Imagine, if you will, this scenario in an enclosed carpark below a multi level residential of mixed class building. It is likely that the carpark shall be sprinkler protected (water), should there be greater than 40 vehicular parking spaces (NCC/BCA requirement) and a carpark exhaust system designed to reduce the carbon monoxide levels to an acceptable level (between 8 and 12ppm) and this would have some use for smoke extraction but significantly less that needed to extract the toxic smoke and off-gassing from a BEV fire.
So we have a fire event occur and the vehicle battery ruptures, significant smoke would fill the surrounding area of the carpark, the sprinkler suppression would activate and the water would meet the battery chemicals where we would start the reactive fire and thermal runaway.

Posted in Building Services Engineering & Compliance, Family & Community, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

How streetlights can create smart cities

@Lighting

The SmartHub.

  

In Hawaii, they are installing a UbiHub on a streetlight in the region. The municipality will be using the smart city hubs to bring free broadband access to Pana’ewa Park.

Startup Ubicquia has rolled out two streetlight platforms designed for smart cities that integrates Wi-Fi, 4K cameras, directional microphones and neural artificial intelligence (AI) processors.

Called UbiHub, the platforms are compatible with more than 360 million streetlights worldwide and can be installed in seconds by replacing the existing streetlight photocell socket. According to Northeast Group, a smart infrastructure market intelligence firm, integrating multiple functions into one platform for smart cities is a way to reduce the cost of ownership for by 42% compared to conventional solutions.

“Installing Wi-Fi infrastructure into streetlights allows communities to have equitable internet access, expanding broadband and closing the digital divide, and in turn, intelligent data can essential services, portable data communications accessibility and future planning development needs.”

Imagine driving late at night in very low traffic and never stopping for a traffic light because the integrated cameras at intersections see you coming and turn the light to green – or the ambulance routing to the hospital with a critical patient and having a clear traffic path provided.

The platforms allow cities to transform existing streetlights into a network of connected digital assets:

Equipping with something alike the UbiHub can enhance existing use cases by:

  • Enabling faster crime detection, investigation and deterrence.
  • Reducing traffic congestion.
  • Improving pedestrian safety.
  • Increasing bicycle lane utilization.
  • Expanding city broadband deployments to commercial areas and parks.

The Ubihub platform example:

The UbiHub AP6 is a triband Wi-Fi access point that gives communities the ability to enable public Wi-Fi. It uses power over Ethernet to support third-party equipment including cameras or vehicle registration plate readers.

The more advanced UbiHub AP/AI includes the same features as the AP6 but also integrated dual 4K cameras, direction microphones, a neural AI processor and buffers 15 days of video storage.

These platforms can be managed and monitored by Ubicquia’s cloud visualization and analytics management system called UbiVu. The system also support APIs that integrate with third party video management systems, evidence clearance platforms and police real-time crime centers.

Current deployments

Ubicquia has already deployed the systems to several cities in the U.S.

In West Hollywood, California, the city is using the platforms for smart city traffic and curb management capabilities for data on traffic, bicycle and pedestrians as well as public safety measures and future planning development needs for its residents.

In the county of Hawai’i, UbiHub is being used to bring free, high-speed internet to Pana’ewa Park, a recreational and educational area in a zoological and botanical area of the county. The city said the deployment of the streetlight platform is an important step to expanding its broadband and closing the digital divide throughout Hawai’i Island.

There have been 12,500 UbiCells deployed in Ontario, California, for smart lighting analytics and energy savings. The city said the system helps the digital divide by rolling out public Wi-Fi and boosting public safety in one platform.

Streetlights as a smart city solution

Given the wide infrastructure already in place for streetlights, upgrading these lights with smart city capable technology is obviously easier than deploying technology where infrastructure doesn’t already exist.

The ease of adding smart city infrastructure to streetlights has helped accelerate the deployment of these technologies for communities.

While many of these smart city features are new for government agencies and can present challenges for cthem, the trials are being found to overcome these issues with adjustment and improvements in the technology and by learning through the examples of current community groups.

Ubicquia is not the only company working on these technologies and last year, Signify and the Smart City infrastructure Fund demonstrated how smart lamp posts can tackle tasks such as overcrowding, traffic management and body temperature detection. This came as the world was still dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic and looking for ways to help improve the situation through technology.

Smart lighting and streetlights have also become an important way for cities to increase 5G infrastructure with the deployment of small cells that boost signals inside cities where they may have trouble moving through buildings, trees and other objects.

Telensa and Eaton Lighting collaborated on a project to integrate lighting, control and smart city solutions using existing streetlight infrastructure to serve as a way for communities to save on energy as well as also putting them on a path toward smart city applications.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My thoughts on abortion

Stages of Pregnancy: Week by Week

The individual’s right to life does not depend on our consent, but the brutality of abortion is possible today because enough citizens have agreed, either implicitly or explicitly, to close their eyes to the truth about what abortion is. That truth is almost too painful to acknowledge, and many have learned to look away instead.

We talk about abortion with euphemisms such as “women’s rights,” “reproductive freedom,” “bodily autonomy,” and the “right to choose.”

But the right to choose what?

Rarely in our public debates do we argue about what abortion actually is. No one who supports abortion wants to talk about what really happens in every abortion procedure, because that reality is grisly and horrifying. It can persist only when we refuse to acknowledge this violence and the many ways that it damages our society and our solidarity with one another.

For a typical Australian who doesn’t spend much time thinking about abortion, consider what it would mean to admit that in the year 2019, our country has legally sanctioned the killing of over 40,000 human beings.

Think of those women who have had abortions, many of whom did so based on misguided conceptions of freedom and autonomy, but many of whom did so because they simply felt pressured or abandoned. Large numbers of both sets of women have suffered physical harm and psychological trauma as a result, and yet they struggle to give voice to those harms in a culture that claims abortion is either no big deal or a cause for celebration.

Consider the relationships and marriages blighted by abortion, women used and abused by men, children who lost a sibling, grandparents who never got to meet a grandchild. No family has ever been better off because of abortion.

Think about the doctors who performed these abortions, who used their medical expertise to kill the vulnerable patient in the womb. It might be difficult to feel empathy for them, but how can they perform abortions and not be harmed by having committed such an act of evil? As Aristotle taught, we become what we do. Those who kill become killers.

Think of the countless politicians and activists who have enabled and promoted abortion, pretending it is a simple, harmless medical procedure, akin to having a tooth pulled.

Think of those who have done nothing to stop this terror.

Think of those—ourselves included—who haven’t done enough.

These are the costs of admitting the truth about abortion, just a small part of why many prefer to turn away and pretend it isn’t true at all. But acknowledge it we must, because ignoring it will only make the problem worse. All of us are affected by the lethal logic of abortion. A society that provides endorsement of abortion devalues the life of every single member as it allows mothers to destroy their children and sanctions violence against the most vulnerable members of the human community. Each of us enters life as being dependent upon our families and particularly on our mothers, and whilst our level of dependence fluctuates throughout our lives, we remain dependent on one another. A healthy society doesn’t deny or try to eliminate dependency; it helps people meet the needs of their neighbours and bear the burdens of each other.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Professional Risk & Public Liability Insurance

We often hear practitioners upset regarding the cost of premiums for Professional Risk and even Public Liability Insurance coverage.

How can we mitigate this??

Firstly:
we need to remember that the reason why we require professional risk and public liability is to give comfort to our customers.

Secondly
We should never think of our insurance cover as being of benefit to the practitioner.

Thirdly:
We need to do our job with such adeptness and skill that there shall be no reason for any party to make any claim.

Claims reductions will follow as reduced claims have a flow-on effect but I would suggest that as things stand with those involved in any part of the construction and building services industry, it shall take up to a decade to make this happen.
This is because of the deplorable state of design and installation of past construction which only now is being appropriately assessed.
Even then we are seeing continuance of non-conformance due to the obstructions placed upon building owners and assessors by local council regulators and this shall see further extended delays.

How it should happen.

Designers: The design team consists of the architect and accredited design engineering specialists for all relevant diciplines and under the oversight of a principal certifier. The designers shall provide concept drawings and specifications including concept safety in design.

Principal Certifiers: Review the concept design drawings and specification. It is essential that the principal certifier is confident in the design and designers.
The principal certifier will represent the schedule one building owner in applying for the development (DA).

Developer / Builder will appoint construction installers which may include in-house accredited engineers (or utilise the original specialist engineers) who may review the concept plans and specifications and provide for construction plans and specifications which must be reviewed and approved by the principal certifier.

Council Officers acting as agents for NSW Planning will assess the Development Application, advise neighbours and assess associated consequences as well as apply appropriate conditions to consent.

The Principal Certifier must, upon development approval, issue a construction certificate which will include the required fire safety schedule based upon the approved for construction plans and specification.
The Principal Certifier will advise the schedule when progress inspections must be conducted by the Principal Certifier (who may be assisted by the specialist design engineer) and must provide the necessary oversight that construction occurs as specified.
The Principal Certifier should vet the accreditation of design engineers and installers as well as that those involved have access to appropriate versions of the schedule referenced Australian Standards.

The Principal Certifier shall ensure that the building manual is progressively compiled and at this stage would include all concept documentation.

The Construction Installers must install as specified and after installation attend to and conduct any commissioning required to ensure that the installation reflects the performance requirements of the design. This commissioning should be witnessed by the accredited design engineer and it should be attested to by the design engineer and commissioning practitioner.
The construction installers shall add to the building manual the as-built drawings, specifications, asset register inclusive of dilapidation register, product test certificates, warranties & guarantees, maintenance / service requirements, commissioning data sheets, etc. and this building manual must be reviewed and accepted by the schedule one building owner prior to occupancy.
The Construction Installers must ensure that the Principal Certifier is aware of any and all known defects prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

The Principal Certifier must inspect and assess the building and deem it “safe to occupy” prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate (this does not mean that the building is fully conforming and without defect – but it does mean that any defects are minor, do not make occupancy unsafe and are expected to be addressed under DLP with Principal Certifier supervision).

At the end of DLP, the Principal Certifier will attest that it is appropriate for the release of any retention, or if all defects have not been addressed have these corrected drawing down upon the retention for funding.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Broken Building Schedules & Regulators/Certifiers in Denial

Yes – I do focus upon the inept building surveyors, but let’s not forget the equally inept fire engineers and installers, etc. who all constitute to this mess we’ve all inherited.

We are still constrained by an industry and Government regulators who advocate and accept that for existing buildings, Principal Certifiers can throw out the requirements of the building code of Australia as long as someone can make any plausible excuse as an offset.

We see no checks and balances applied to have any accountability (except for those new developments having a Class 2 component and where they are part of the 6% flagged for audit by the building commissioner). The Principal Certifiers are no longer effectively monitored by BPB and we would suggest that they never were anyway.

Whist there are a few diligent Principal Certifiers out there who do effectively fulfil their role, these are largely bypassed or castigated because they slow things up too much and elevate costs to correct non-compliances.

Most Principal Certifiers simply accept that any design with a report from a fire engineer, allows degradation of fire safety measures without any restoration of equity.
We recently had an example of a large warehouse which had the FER eliminate vehicle access referencing that if the warehouse was fitted with fire suppression this was ok. It then went on to offset the requirement for sprinkler suppression due to the height of the ceiling void.
Another example is a deemed warehouse built for a vehicle auctioneer where over 200 cars were stored, the FER claimed it as a warehouse so no sprinkler suppression (required for 40+ vehicles).
Another often found example is conceptual terms used within the fire safety schedule (this voids the validity of the schedule) such as an automatic fire detection system to AS1670.1 or fire alarm system to AS3786 may be installed.
Another is where the schedule has every year reference for the BCA as well as standards as the same year and there was never any of these standards versions with that year.
We’ve come across others where the solution was an unjustifiable opinion (Public grandstand reduced aisle and seatback spacing with reasoning that the occupants were all young and agile). How does this claptrap get through and accepted??

As a Principal Certifier, it is required that they shall be the entity who provides the Fire Safety Schedule for any development inclusive of relevant year version referencing and include that schedule with the construction certificate for any development.
Where the Principal Certifier does not have the expertise to provide any part of that schedule or where the performance requirements are not as prescribed, the Principal Certifier must be confident that the system will perform as designed by the qualified (/accredited) systems designer who shall remain accountable for that design.

The Principal Certifier is accountable for ensuring that the installers provide a build which reflects specifically the performance requirements and conformance requirements detailed and defined in the fire safety schedule. The Principal Certifier must receive and be satisfied by the evidence of performance and installation details and that that performance has been attested to.

The Principal Certifier must be provided with a disclosure of any and all observable non-conformances (defects) and only then may form the opinion that the building may be safe to occupy.

The Principal Certifier shall be provided with all baseline data (incl. as-builts, certificates, warranties, commissioning) associated with the project and review same prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

Upon receipt of the Occupation Certificate, the regulator should review the fire safety schedule and query any anomalies prior to issuing the Fire Safety Schedule of Record.

The Role of the Accredited Practitioner Fire Safety:

The APFS checks that the measures listed on the Fire Safety Schedule exist and achieve the performance required of them.

Where the measure fails to perform, then the building owner is responsible to restore that performance to the required level.

Where the measure fails to exist, or the existence of unlisted measures, or where the fire safety schedule is inappropriate – the APFS should inform the regulator (Local Council) to take action.
It is not the role of the APFS to reconstitute the fire safety schedule, but rather the Council Building Surveyor.

Can we please all do our job??

Can AAC & AIBS do something about education and training to somehow get these Building Surveyors doing and understanding their job and hold those who don’t to account.
Similarly we see Engineers Australia and others doing nothing but collect membership fees when they are presented with clear evidence that members have breached their codes of practice and that their engineering is flawed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment